Regina v Chal – Times Law Reports

Hearsay evidence admissible in hearing whether unfit accused did act

Regina v Chal

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“The provisions concerning admissibility of hearsay evidence in a criminal trial applied to proceedings to determine whether a person under a disability did the act or made the omission in the offence with which he was charged.”

The Times, 26th October 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

0 Responses to “Regina v Chal – Times Law Reports”



  1. No Comments Yet

Leave a Reply




 

October 2007
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Categories