“Relatives of those who died in the 7 July bombings fear the inquests into their deaths could be heard in secret.”
BBC News, 19th March 2008
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
“Relatives of those who died in the 7 July bombings fear the inquests into their deaths could be heard in secret.”
BBC News, 19th March 2008
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
Why would an inquest into a July Seveth victim be a threat to ‘National Security’? What aspect of the state machinations would be compromised by an inquest that was truly independent? The legislation changes contained within the Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008 [specifically the proposed power of the state to a) remove a jury and/or family members from an inquest & b) sack/appoint/replace any particular coroner of their choosing] are extremely worrying.
One can explicitly see why the state would want to interfere into the inquest of Jean Charles de Menezes (to protect Operational matters etc.), but why/how would ‘National Security’ be compromised in an inquest of a July 7th Victim?
Is it because the government ‘July 7th narrative’ would not then stand up to scrutiny?
See http://tinyurl.com/34p9z4