Archive for June 16th, 2008



Recent Statutory Instruments – OPSI

The Assembly Learning Grants and Loans (Higher Education) (Wales) Regulations 2008

The Dee Estuary Cockle Fishery Order 2008

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Amendment of section 323) Regulations 2008

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Amendments to Part 7) Regulations 2008

The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2008

The Multiplex Licence (Broadcasting of Programmes in Gaelic) Order 2008

The Television Multiplex Services (Reservation of Digital Capacity) Order 2008

The Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (Commencement) Order 2008

The Community Bus (Amendment) Regulations 2008

The Motor Cycles Etc. (Single Vehicle Approval) (Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2008

The Representation of the People (Amendment) Regulations 2008

The Immigration (Biometric Registration) Regulations 2008

The Immigration (Biometric Registration) (Civil Penalty Code of Practice) Order 2008

Source: www.opsi.gov.uk

Redknapp and Another v Commissioner of the City of London Police and Another – Times Law Reports

Redknapp and Another v Commissioner of the City of London Police and Another

Queen’s Bench Divisional Court

“Reasons for seeking the issue of an search warrant had to be set out to make it valid. For its execution to be lawful, the occupier of the premises had to be shown and given a copy of the warrant. ”

The Times, 16th June 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Khan v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis – Times Law Reports

Khan v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

Court of Appeal

“Police powers to enter and search a premises without a warrant, could be used only where those premises were, in fact, occupied or controlled by a person under arrest, and not where the police had merely a reasonable belief that the suspect occupied or controlled the premises.”

The Times, 16th June 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Gibson v Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office – WLR Daily

Gibson v Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office [2008] EWCA Civ 645; [2008] WLR (D) 189

“The wife of a convicted drug dealer was entitled to keep her interest in the matrimonial home despite a finding in confiscation proceedings that she had guilty knowledge of the source of her husband’s wealth. The Drug Trafficking Act 1994 did not give the court power to bring her share of the equity in the matrimonial home within the confiscation order, since the assets were hers without any court order in her favour.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Pietrzak v Regional Court in Wloclawek, Poland – WLR Daily

Pietrzak v Regional Court in Wloclawek, Poland; [2008] WLR (D) 190

“Art 8(1) of European Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 set out the contents necessary for a valid European arrest warrant: additional information specified in the form in the annex to the Framework Decision did not form part of the warrant for the purposes of validity.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R (L) v Merton London Borough Council – WLR Daily

R (L) v Merton London Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 191

“The Arrangements for Placement of Children (General) Regulations 1991 (SI 1991/890), reg 13 did not impose a maximum of 120 days of respite care in a 12-month period, although Department of Health guidance (‘Respite care: series of short-term placements of children’ (LAC (95) 14) ) appeared to indicate otherwise.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) – WLR Daily

Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 624; [2008] WLR (D) 192

“Where a council tenant exercising his right to buy had served an operative notice of delay on the council, the housing benefit which he received counted as the payment of rent so as to reduce the purchase price for the purposes of ss 153A(5), 153B and 155(3A) of the 1985 Act, as amended.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.


June 2008
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Categories