Supreme Court tasked with setting compulsory retirement precedent – The Lawyer

“What legitimate social policy could justify retiring a partner or employee?

The Supreme Court will decide after Clarkson Wright & Jakes partner Leslie ­Seldon was given permission to fight his former firm over its decision to retire him at the age of 65.
Seldon argues that his firm was wrong to enact the partnership agreement and retire him because, he claims, it could not justify the action.”

Full story

The Lawyer, 7th March 2011

Source: www.thelawyer.com

0 Responses to “Supreme Court tasked with setting compulsory retirement precedent – The Lawyer”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s




March 2011
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Categories


%d bloggers like this: