Archive for the 'admissibility' Category

Using intercept evidence in court ‘not yet viable’ – BBC News

“The use of intercept evidence in criminal trials is not yet ‘legally or practically viable’, the independent reviewer of terror laws has said.”

Full story

BBC News, 10th December 2009

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Ban intercept evidence in terror trials, advises Lord Carlile – The Guardian

“Intercept evidence should not be allowed into British terror trials, the government’s terrorism reviewer said today.”

Full story

The Guardian, 24th November 2009

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

R v Downer – WLR Daily

R v Downer  [2009] EWCA Crim 1361; [2009] WLR (D) 233

“The offence of aggravated burglary under s 10 (1) of the Theft Act 1968 was not to be regarded as an indivisible offence and, in order to find out what constituted a burglary, it was essential to have regard to the two types of burglary described in (a) and (b) of s 9(1) of the Act.”

WLR Daily, 7th July 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R v Mayers; R v Glasgow; R v Costelloe; R v Bahmanzadeh; R v P and others – WLR Daily

R v Mayers; R v Glasgow; R v Costelloe; R v Bahmanzadeh; R v P and others [2008] EWCA Crim 1418; [2008] WLR (D) 390

In relation to criminal proceedings there was no power, whether under the Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008 or otherwise, to admit statements of anonymous witnesses made otherwise than in oral evidence in the proceedings.”

WLR Daily, 16th December 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.


Lifely v Lifely – Times Law Reports

Lifely v Lifely

Court of Appeal

“When the court was considering the admissibility of arguably wrongfully obtained fresh evidence it might consider factors going beyond the classical test.”

The Times, 27th August 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

R v Freeman; R v Crawford – WLR Daily

R v Freeman; R v Crawford [2008] EWCA Crim 1863; [2008] WLR (D) 287

“Some care was required in directing a jury when approaching the cross-admissibility of bad character evidence.”

WLR Daily, 11th August 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Lifely v Lifely – WLR Daily

Lifely v Lifely [2008] EWCA Civ 904; [2008] WLR (D) 280

“Where fresh evidence had arguably been wrongfully obtained considerations beyond the classical requirements under the Ladd v Marshall test might be appropriate when the court was considering whether such evidence should be admitted.”

WLR Daily, 1st August 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.


July 2017
M T W T F S S
« May    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Categories