Archive for the 'compulsory purchase' Category

R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council – WLR Daily

R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council [2010] UKSC 20; [2010] WLR (D) 123

“A planning authority, in considering the exercise of its compulsory purchase powers in relation to one site, was not entitled to take into account a commitment by a developer to secure the redevelopment of another unconnected site.”

WLR Daily, 13th May 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

 Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed

R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council – WLR Daily

R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 734; [2009] WLR (D) 278

“S 226(1A) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 did not prevent a planning authority, when considering the exercise of its compulsory purchase powers, from having regard to wider benefits resulting from the development, redevelopment or improvement of or in relation to the land, which might include benefits deriving from the associated redevelopment of another site not within the proposed development itself.”

WLR Daily, 3rd August 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Transport for London (London Underground Ltd) v Spirerose Ltd (in administration) – WLR Daily

Transport for London (London Underground Ltd) v Spirerose Ltd (in administration) [2009] UKHL 44; [2009] WLR (D) 273

“Where permission for the redevelopment of the claimant’s land would on the balance of probability have been granted as at the valuation date, the Lands Tribunal had not been entitled to value the land on the basis that permission would actually have been granted rather than on the basis of ‘hope value’.”

WLR Daily, 31st July 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Union Railways (North) Ltd and another v Kent County Council – WLR Daily

Union Railways (North) Ltd and another v Kent County Council [2009] EWCA Civ 363; [2009] WLR (D) 143

“In a compulsory purchase order case in which applicable notices to treat had been served on the landowner, but not on a company which claimed previously to have acquired certain rights partly over land acquired under the order, the company was not excluded per se by reason of s 22 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 from making a reference to the Lands Tribunal seeking compensation.”

WLR Daily, 5th May 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Spirerose Ltd (In Administration) v Transport for London – WLR Daily

Spirerose Ltd (In Administration) v Transport for London [2008] EWCA Civ 1230; [2008] WLR (D) 358

“In concluding that a valuation of the claimant’s land on the basis that at the date of valuation there would have been a determined planning application granting permission , the Lands Tribunal had not erred. In the absence of an actual planning permission or a permission that was required to be assumed under the Land Compensation Act 1961, the tribunal was not limited to assessing the value by reference to the view that the market would have taken as to the prospects of achieving planning permission, the hope value.”

WLR Daily, 14th November 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council – Times Law Reports

Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council

Court of Appeal

“Where a local authority compulsorily purchased a public open space after refusing the landowner’s application for housing development, the Lands Tribunal had to value the land on the basis that planning permission had been granted for the housing development.”

The Times, 28th August 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council – WLR Daily

Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 286

“On the proper interpretation of ss 14(1) and 15 (3) of the Land Compensation Act 1961 the amount of compensation payable for compulsory acquisition of vacant land on which Victorian houses had stood prior to their destruction during the Second World War should be based on the assumption that planning permission had been granted for specified development even though planning permission for such development had in fact been refused.”

WLR Daily, 5th August 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.


June 2017
M T W T F S S
« May    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Categories