Archive for the 'easements' Category

Waterman and Another v Boyle and Another – Times Law Reports

Waterman and Another v Boyle and Another

Court of Appeal

“An express right to park two vehicles at a property did not imply a further right to park additional vehicles.”

The Times, 30th March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Waterman and another v Boyle and another – WLR Daily

Waterman and another v Boyle and another [2009] EWCA Civ 115; [2009] WLR (D) 76

Where there was an express right to park attaching to a property it was most unlikely that a further right to park would arise by implication.”

WLR Daily, 2nd March 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Judge sums up with Shakespeare – The Guardian

“A senior appeal court judge livened up a hearing over a boundary dispute yesterday by quoting from Shakespeare.”

Full story

The Guardian, 19th April 2008

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Reforming the law governing easements, covenants and profits à prendre – Law Commision

“On 28 March 2008 the Law Commission published a consultation paper provisionally proposing wide-ranging reform of the law governing easements, covenants and profits à prendre.”

Full consultation

Law Commission, 28th March 2008

Source: www.lawcom.gov.uk

Housden and Another v. Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons – Times Law Reports

No private right of way possible

Housden and Another v. Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons

Chancery Division

“A prescriptive right based on 40 years of use could not be acquired under section 2 of the Prescription Act 1832 where the servient owners had powers derived from a statute that rendered it unlawful for them to grant the right claimed.”

The Times, 4th June 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Housden and another v. the Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons – WLR Daily

Housden and another v. the Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons

“Where the capacity or power of the servient owner derived from a statute which rendered it unlawful for him to grant a particular easement no such right could be acquired by prescription under s 2 of the Prescription Act 1832.”

WLR Daily, 17th May 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.


August 2017
M T W T F S S
« May    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Categories