Archive for the 'freedom of movement' Category



Sixteen-hour control order curfews breach human rights, supreme court told – The Guardian

“Control orders involving a curfew lasting 16 hours a day violate fundamental rights, the supreme court was told today as it heard a case attempting to change the use of the controversial measures.”

Full story

The Guardian, 5th May 2010

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions – WLR Daily

Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] EWCA Civ 1358; [2009] WLR (D) 363

“A dependent family member of an EU national who retained worker status should be treated as living in Great Britain under the terms of art 2 of Council Directive 2004/38/EC (the Citizenship Directive) for the purpose of considering the dependent’s eligibility for a United Kingdom pension credit.”

WLR Daily, 15th December 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

OQ (India) and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department: SM (India) v Same – WLR Daily

OQ (India) and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (India) v Same [2009] WLR (D) 343

“Where a person, in reliance, inter alia, upon art 3(2) of the Citizen Directive, sought to claim a right of entry and residence as a dependant of a Union citizen, there was no requirement to ask whether the claimed dependence arose from a need for the support of such a citizen.”

WLR daily, 26th November 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

 

R (Low) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – WLR Daily

R (Low) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 35 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 15

A worker, who was a national of a non member state, sent by a service provider exercising its freedom to provide services pursuant to art 49 EC, from one member state to another had to be lawfully resident in the sending member state in order to acquire any rights under art 49 EC.”

WLR Daily, 22nd January 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.


August 2019
M T W T F S S
« May    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Categories