Archive for the 'reasons' Category

Judge reveals reason for Top Gear’s Stig ruling – BBC News

“A judge has explained his decision for refusing to ban a book revealing the identity of Top Gear’s The Stig.”

Full story

BBC News, 4th October 2010

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Regina v Y (A) – WLR Daily

Regina v Y (A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762;  [2010] WLR (D) 112

“Where a person possessed information likely to be useful to a terrorist within the meaning of s 58(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000, the fact that the possession was for the purpose of lawful self-defence which was solely defensive was capable of amounting to the statutory defence of reasonable excuse under s 58(3) of the 2000 Act, to an offence of possession under s 58(1).”

WLR Daily, 6th May 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

H (a Child) v East Sussex County Council – Times Law Reports

H (a Child) v East Sussex County Council

Court of Appeal

“Special educational needs tribunals were required to give only summary reasons for their decisions.”

The Times, 22nd April 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina (Mendes and Another) v Southwark London Borough Council – Times Law Reports

Regina (Mendes and Another) v Southwark London Borough Council

Court of Appeal

“A judge needed to give reasons for preferring one side’s arguments over the other on an application made by written submissions concerning costs.”

The Times, 7th April 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

R (Mendes and another) v Southwark London Borough Council – WLR Daily

R (Mendes and another) v Southwark London Borough Council; [2009] WLR (D) 108

“A judge needed to give reasons for preferring one side’s arguments over the other on an application for costs made by written submissions following the case being settled.”

WLR Daily, 25th March 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd and another – WLR Daily

“The universal obligation of judicial tribunals to give reasons which were candid, intelligible, transparent and coherent were qualities which litigants and the public were entitled to expect in all reasoned judgments. Transparency meant that properly drawn reasons should make it possible for the reader to find sources especially, but not only, sources of law, which were referred to but not recited in the judgment.”

Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd and another [2008] EWCA Civ 1446; [2008] WLR (D) 396

WLR Daily, 18th December 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

In re M (a Child) (Nonaccidental injury: Burden of proof) – Times Law Reports

In re M (a Child) (Nonaccidental injury: Burden of proof)

Court of Appeal

“Counsel had a positive duty to raise with the judge not only any alleged deficiency in the judge’s reasoning but also any genuine query or ambiguity which arose on the judgment.”

The Times, 16th December 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.


April 2017
M T W T F S S
« May    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Categories