Archive for the 'restraint orders' Category

CPS to prosecute online stalkers – The Guardian

“Stalkers, including those who use the internet to target victims, will face tougher action, it was announced today, as prosecutors admitted they have failed to take the problem seriously in the past.”

Full story

The Guardian, 23rd September 2010

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

In re M (Restraint order: Reasonable living expenses) – Times Law Reports

In re M (Restraint order: Reasonable living expenses)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“Where reasonable living expenses were made available as an exception to a restraining order, those expenses could not be used to pay contributions to the Legal Services Commission for publicly funded representation in related proceedings.”

The Times, 16th June 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

King v Director of Serious Fraud Office – WLR Daily

King v Director of Serious Fraud Office [2009] UKHL 17; [2009] WLR (D) 100

The Crown Court’s jurisdiction, under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005, to make a restraint and disclosure order following a request by a foreign prosecutor was restricted to property located within England and Wales.”

WLR Daily, 18th March 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in once of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

King v Serious Fraud Office – Times Law Reports

King v Serious Fraud Office

House of Lords

“The crown court’s jurisdiction to make a restraint and disclosure order following a request by a foreign prosecutor under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order (SI 2005 No 3181) was restricted to property located within England and Wales.”

The Times, 19th March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Regina v M (Restraint order: Jurisdiction) – Times Law Reports

Regina v M (Restraint order: Jurisdiction)

Court of Appeal

“A trial judge did have jurisdiction to try an application by the prosecution for a defendant to be committed for contempt for allegedly breaching a restraint order.”

The Times, 24th October 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

R v M – WLR Daily

R v M; [2008] WLR (D) 297

“Where a defendant in criminal proceedings was said to have breached a restraint order, imposed under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, by making certain prohibited transactions a judge of the Crown Court had jurisdiction to try an application made by the prosecution for the defendant to be committed for contempt.”

WLR Daily, 1st September 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Irwin Mitchell (a Firm) v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and Another – Times Law Reports

Irwin Mitchell (a Firm) v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and Another

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“It was not the purpose of a criminal restraint order to prevent third parties from enforcing civil rights against a defendant if those rights would be unaffected by a confiscation order which might be made against the defendant at the end of criminal proceedings against him.”

The Times, 27th August 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.


June 2017
M T W T F S S
« May    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Categories